Difference between revisions of "User talk:ForceFlow"

Revision as of 10:02, 19 March 2016 (view source) Jimpal (talk \| contribs) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 01:32, 3 July 2018 (view source) ForceFlow (talk \| contribs) (Blanked the page)
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:

−	So, what was ultimately wrong with the M-200 data signal chart? It looks like a lot of continuity test points were lost with the new chart.--[[User:Jimpal\|Jimpal]] ([[User talk:Jimpal\|talk]]) 20:57, 18 March 2016 (CDT)
−
−
−	Please forward the inconsistencies in the chart, please. Doing a cursory search over the chart, I could not find any. However, I did not use a fine-toothed comb. I would rather see a chart that had more info. If you've ever had to diagnose a broken trace on a Bally, the more info definitely helps. I've always used the schematics, but a chart would be better, provided that it is accurate.--[[User:Jimpal\|Jimpal]] ([[User talk:Jimpal\|talk]]) 10:02, 19 March 2016 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 01:32, 3 July 2018