Difference between revisions of "User talk:ForceFlow"

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-So, what was ultimately wrong with the M-200 data signal chart?  It looks like a lot of continuity test points were lost with the new chart.--[[User:Jimpal|Jimpal]] ([[User talk:Jimpal|talk]]) 20:57, 18 March 2016 (CDT)
-Please forward the inconsistencies in the chart, please.  Doing a cursory search over the chart, I could not find any.  However, I did not use a fine-toothed comb.  I would rather see a chart that had more info.  If you've ever had to diagnose a broken trace on a Bally, the more info definitely helps.  I've always used the schematics, but a chart would be better, provided that it is accurate.--[[User:Jimpal|Jimpal]] ([[User talk:Jimpal|talk]]) 10:02, 19 March 2016 (CDT)
-Well crap. I used the "rollback" link, thinking I was going to roll back the deletion of the old table. It apparently rolled back a lot more, going all the way back to ForceFlow's editing of the section.
-So again, what did Andrew think was wrong with the table? I suspect that table was simply copied into the Wiki from Clay's old guide. -- Hibler
-I copied the chart from an old revision and added it back. I intentionally created a revision that removed the old chart so that it could be restored easily. The edits after restoring an older version made that difficult.--Force

Latest revision as of 00:32, 3 July 2018